Saturday, March 13, 2010

So How Come We Don't Invest the Time to Really Measure Training Programs?

We know it is important to measure the effectiveness of a training programs, yet we don't always take the time to do it right. Why is that? Are we too busy and just don't have the time to do so? Maybe we don't think it is all that important after all.

If the participant in the class believes they learned new skills and tell us they increased their knowledge - maybe it's sufficient? I don't think that is what we believe.

Maybe we just don't know where to start! We want to start slowly for sure - let's not jump into doing a business impact and ROI study just yet! (We do want to get there at some point though.)

Based on the last poll (which is certainly not statistically accurate but interesting nonetheless) it seems that much of the time we gauge the effectiveness of training through a survey.

If some of the respondents to the poll are similar to many clients I work with, they are thinking of a simple survey that asks questions such as:

* How was the training?
* Did you learn new skills in this class?
* Are you pleased overall with the training you received?

Or, as it is frequently called, "the smile sheet." Not much good, really usable information coming out of these surveys.

I can understand the issue of not having enough time to measure the effectiveness of a training program; especially if you have quite a few programs to oversee or running training programs is just a small part of everything you do (we all wear so many hats!).

However, you can do better than just the standard smile sheet without increasing your workload significantly and getting some better information to share with others in the organization. And, moving yourself closer to your goal of effective measurement of your training programs.

Some additional questions on the survey will provide you better data on the effectiveness of the training program. For example, add the following questions to your survey:

* What percent of your total work time will require the knowledge and skills presented in this training?

* On a scale of 1 to 10, how critical is applying the content of this program to your success on the job?

* What potential barriers could prevent you from applying the knowledge and skills learned in the course?

* What specific actions will you take to implement your new skills and knowledge on the job?

* What are the benefits the company will realize based on you applying your new skills and knowledge on the job? (Be as specific as possible.)

* What would happen with respect to costs and/or productivity if you were not able to apply your new skills and knowledge to your job? (Be as specific as possible.)

See link at the bottom for a sample completed Action Plan.

As you can see, just adding some additional questions to your current survey will help you gather more significant data to determine the effectiveness of the training program. Not much more time commitment on your part, but the data you gather will enable you to better determine what improvements need to be made in your training programs.

You may also learn what needs to be done in the organization to better support the training. For example, the question, "What potential barriers could prevent you from applying the knowledge and skills learned in the course," will provide insight as to why skills may not be applied back on the job.

You may need to address some organizational issues or management barriers that are prohibiting the participant from applying his/her new skills.

Follow-Up

A follow-up survey, 2 - 4 months after the training program ends (or when the individual will have the opportunity to apply the skills), will enable you to find out how successful the individuals have been in applying their skills back on the job.

The follow-up survey should focus on questions such as:

* What is enabling you to provide your skills back on the job?
* What barriers have you faced on applying your skills?
* How have you applied your skills? (Be specific.)
* What impact have you had on the business because you have applied your new skills and knowledge? (Be specific - explain how you calculated/determined that impact.)

How About a Manager Survey?

Can I push you just a bit more? How about at the same time you send out the follow-up survey you also include a brief survey to the manager of the participant? This survey is to gather data from the manager on how they are seeing the application of the skills by the participant. For example, questions you ask the manager might include:

* What improvement in skills have you seen based on the training program the participant attended?
* What business impact have you seen because of the application of these skills?
* What percentage of the new skills and knowledge is directly applicable to the participant's job?
* Has the participant been assigned any new projects or responsibility due to this training program? Please explain.

How easily might you incorporate just a few extra questions into your survey to improve the data on the effectiveness of your training? How easily can you launch a follow-up survey at your organization?

For a sample partially completed Action Plan template provided for your reference. Click Here

By : Gina_Abudi

Strategies For Reaching Global Markets - Contract Manufacturing and Joint Ventures

With many companies scrambling today to become more competitive on a global level and meet consumer demands for lower prices, many of the methods for reaching global markets and joint ventures with foreign firms are looking more and more attractive.

One of the options available to product manufacturers is contract manufacturing with foreign producers. Much like licensing, contract manufacturing involves a foreign company that produces goods for another company.

However, where licensing involves the manufacturer using the company's trademark or brand name under license and the sale of consulting services on the part of the licensor, contract manufacturing involves a company that already produces a private-label product and another company attaching their brand name or trademark.

In contract manufacturing, the manufacturer has no rights to the trademark. Contract manufacturing is often a form of offshore outsourcing where a company produces a product for a specific brand.

Examples of this can be seen in a number of large US corporations. Singapore contract manufacturers often produce cell phones and other electronics for a number of US brands, and China is a leading contract manufacturer for US computers and laptops like Dell.

The benefits of contract manufacturing for startup companies or smaller businesses can be great, as contract manufacturing often allows these companies to experiment with different product variations in different markets without having hefty production costs associated with a local manufacturing facility.

In addition, for established companies, production of successful products can easily be expanded to meet new demands without incurring additional costs and overhead.

Aside from contract manufacturing, forming international joint ventures and strategic alliances are also great ways to expand into the global market. However, these type of joint ventures have traditionally been used more by larger corporations.

A joint venture is a type of arrangement where two companies join together for a particular project. Examples of this are often seen in the motor industry where American car companies enter into a joint venture with Asian car manufacturers in order to produce vehicles for all markets.

The two companies, which are often from two separate countries, share technology and risks associated with the project, along with marketing and management skills.

The advantage of these kinds of ventures is that many companies who would not otherwise be able to enter some markets are able to work together with local companies that have access to those markets.

A strategic alliance is much of the same thing, tying together two or more companies with a common goal. However, in a strategic alliance, companies typically do not share costs, management, or profits.

While these kinds of arrangements can be beneficial at reaching other markets, the disadvantages are much like in a licensing agreement, where one company can take the other companies technology and expertise, leave the arrangement, and use the ideas to promote their own company or profits.

By : Dave_Vower